≡ Menu

One of my bookish weaknesses is fiction with creative narrative structure. I love novels in letters, novels with dual narratives or multiple narrators, really anything that plays around with structure in some way. Both of the books I want to write about today have something a little unique in the way they tell their stories.

Girl Through Glass by Sari Wilson

girl through glass by sari wilsonGirl Through Glass is told in through one of my favorite narrative twists, dual narratives. One, set in the summer of 1977, follows 11-year-old Mira and her quest to succeed in the competitive world of New York City ballet. Mira hopes to eventually be accepted into the School of American Ballet, run by choreographer George Balanchine. She gets an assist, of sorts, from her mentor, 47-year-old Maurice DuPont, and their relationship intensifies as Mira ascends in the world of ballet. In the present, the story follows Kate, a dance professor at a university in the Midwest, who receives a letter from someone in her past she assumed was dead, setting her on a course to investigate a world she thought she left behind.  

As you might be able to tell from my description, I found one of these narrative threads much more compelling than the other – one of the risks when an author tries to follow two stories in this way. While I was curious about Kate and her investigation into her past, I thought several of her early choices in the book made absolutely no sense and I struggled to get a grip on her as a character. But Mira is drawn so very well and lives in a world that’s vivid and unfamiliar. I loved learning about the intensity of this history of American ballet, especially the influence of Russian dancers on training here in the United States. It’s clear from the beginning that Mira’s story is heading on a collision course of some kind, but I didn’t know what to expect and enjoyed reading that part very much.

Overall, I thought Girl Through Glass was an interesting novel, certainly worth reading if you have a curiosity for ballet novels, but won’t be among my favorites given the weakness of one of the narrative threads.

Read Bottom Up by Neel Shah and Skye Chatham

read bottom upRead Bottom Up is another book that uses another of my favorite formats, the epistolary novel (aka, a novel in letters). In this case, the story of a relationship is told through e-mails and text messages between the potentially doomed lovebirds – Madeline and Elliot – and their best friends, Emily and David. The quirkiest marketing gimmick of the novel is that the authors, Neel Shah and Skye Chatham (a pen name for essayist Sloan Crosley), wrote the novel by exchanging emails in real time, blind to the side conversations their characters were having with each other.

I call that last part a gimmick because, to be honest, it’s hard to really see how that conceit played out as the story was being written other than, perhaps, helping to make the exchanges between Madeline and Elliot feel more authentic. The women, written by Chatham, and the men, written by Shah, certainly have distinct voices and ways of interacting that also felt genuine to me. I thought this was an engaging little book that explores some of the quirks of any relationships in a digital age – what to share, how fast to move, and how to interpret communication in writing when it’s devoid of context. I read this book in an afternoon and while I didn’t fall in love with it, I did find it an enjoyable read.

Some of the links in this post are affiliate links through Amazon. If you make a purchase through any of those links, I will receive a small commission.
{ 9 comments }

Off My Shelves: Fun Nonfiction

fun nonfiction

As I mentioned in my post on Sunday, I’ve struggling to find reading to fit my mood. As I thought about it a bit this week, I realized that my reading, especially in nonfiction, has been pretty serious lately… and, thanks to Alexander Hamilton, pretty dense.

So I took to my bookshelves (#ReadMyOwnDamnBooks) to find a few that seem to fit the general theme of Fun and Easy Nonfiction For My Tired Brain. Here’s what I found:

Flawless: Inside the Largest Diamond Heist in History by Scott Andrew Selby and Greg Campbell – Who doesn’t love a good heist narrative?

The Steal: A Cultural History of Shoplifting by Rachel Shteir – Cultural history many not seem like the most fun topic in the world, but I think it’s fascinating. Crime in general, especially crime that’s high-drama but low-stakes, always interests me.

Careless People: Murder, Mayhem, and the Invention of The Great Gatsby by Sarah Churchman – I really have a dark sense of fun… but seriously, murder and mayhem! SO FUN (in books and in history, not in real life).

Cat Is Art Spelled Wrong, edited by Caroline Casey, Chris Fischbach and Sara Schultz – A collection of essays on our fascination with cat videos as well as what makes art and how we talk about taste. I’m up on the fence about whether this is going to be too dense to be fun… but gotta love that cover.

The Law of Superheroes by James Daily and Ryan Davidson – A look at how our legal system would work in the world of comic books.

Gulp: Adventures on the Alimentary Canal by Mary Roach — Mary Roach is one of my go to authors when I want nonfiction that’s smart, funny and fun. This book is all about the digestive system… eew?

A couple of other recommendations in my previously read books include Stiff by Mary Roach (what happens to bodies donated to medical science) and The Great Beanie Baby Bubble by Zac Bissonnette. Both of those were quite a lot of fun to read (but in the case of Mary Roach, only if you have a strong stomach).  

And with that, I would love to hear some of your recommendations. What are some of your favorite fun nonfiction reads?

Some of the links in this post are affiliate links through Amazon. If you make a purchase through any of those links, I will receive a small commission.
{ 33 comments }

Currently | A Reading Machine

currently january 24

Time and Place | Around 8:30 a.m., on my couch. I’m not really feeling the computer this morning, so I think this will be a quick post.

Reading | Since last Sunday, I finished Read Bottom Up by Neel Shah and Skye Chatham (a modern love story told through e-mails and text messages) and Presence by Amy Cuddy (nonfiction about the connection between body language and our emotions). I’m still (slowly) making my way through Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow — just two weeks behind on the #HamAlong!

Watching | Last night the boyfriend and I watched Wild, the movie based on Cheryl Strayed’s memoir of walking 1,100 miles along the Pacific Coast Trail. I really liked it, and the boyfriend did too (unexpected!).

Cooking | Last week’s experiment with Crock Pot White Chicken Chili wasn’t my favorite — the flavors were great, but I like my soups heartier than that recipe. The quest goes on.

Blogging | This week I shared some thoughts on Gold Fame Citrus by Claire Vaye Watkins and pondered what to do when your reading goals conflict.

Loving | We went to a new-to-us restaurant for dinner last night and I had an awesome bacon cheeseburger. I haven’t had one of those in awhile… so good.

Wanting | I really want a book that’s going to grab me. I’m not in a reading slump — I’ve finished six books already this month — but the books I’ve been picking up haven’t wowed me. The problem is I can’t quite pin down what I’m in the mood to read.

Anticipating | We don’t have anything planned today, so I’m excited to have a full day to re-energize before the work week sets in again.

Sympathies to those of you on the East Coast in the middle of that epic snowstorm — drive slowly and stay safe! To everyone, happy Sunday! What are you reading today?

Some of the links in this post are affiliate links through Amazon. If you make a purchase through any of those links, I will receive a small commission.
{ 20 comments }

What Happens When Your Reading Goals Conflict?

I set two primary reading goals this year: read more diversely (which, for me, means prioritizing books by authors of color), and read the books on my shelves. The problem, I’ve discovered, is that my shelves don’t reflect the kind of diversity I’m hoping to consume now. 

A good chunk of the books sitting on the unread shelves in my office were purchased at least a year or two ago, before reading diversely was something I thought consciously about or put an effort towards. I got a lot of them at used bookstores and used book sales, where I’d think more about the topic than the author. When I scan the authors on my bookshelves now they’re overwhelmingly white.

So what’s a goal-oriented reader to do? Is there a way to reconcile these two reading goals? I’ve been thinking about it off and on for the last couple of weeks, and I think I have a few strategies that may also apply more generally if you have a similar clash between your different reading goals:

  1. Acquire books that meet my goals. Let’s be real – I’m definitely not going to stop buying books this year. I’m too much of an addict to quit. What I can do is prioritize acquiring books by authors of color. If there are two books I’m curious about, my buying power should go to books that can help me further my diversity goals in some way.
  2. Use the library more. My library has a great collection and good connections to other libraries through interlibrary loan. I can get a lot of diverse books that way, as long as I plan ahead a little bit and do a decent job managing my hold list.
  3. Sort out my bookshelves better. At this point, my shelves are double stacked with books, meaning a lot of them are hidden from view. I need to take some time to get the books by diverse authors front and center so they’re top of mind when I’m selecting my next read.
  4. Lists, lists, lists. I love a good list. I’ve been working to put together lists of books I want to read and books I own by diverse authors so, like the bookshelf sorting, they stay top of mind.
  5. Set specific goals. The goals to “read more diversely” and “read my own books” are pretty general, which is a bad strategy, if you listen to goal-setting experts. I need to think of a way to make my goals more specific – maybe a percentage or number of each type of book – so that it’s easy to see how I’m doing and make adjustments on the fly.

While I’m writing specifically about my own reading goals, these strategies might also be applicable if you have other goals that seem to conflict. Acquire new books that meet your goals, and use free sources like the library (or cheap sources like a used bookstore) to make sure you have the books you need to meet other goals. Make your goals specific, and find ways to keep them in front of you as the year progresses. And make sure to track carefully so you can make sure you’re heading in the right direction.

What strategies do you have to help you meet your reading goals?

{ 16 comments }

gold fame citrus by claire vaye watkinsMy final book of 2015 was Gold Fame Citrus by Claire Vaye Watkins. It was a book I really enjoyed, but also a book I didn’t feel like I really “got” until I closed the last page and started looking for some analysis online.

Be warned, this whole post is pretty full of spoilers for the book.

It’s not that the book is complicated. The plot actually follows pretty well-worn territory. Ray and Luz are living as squatters in a former starlets house in Los Angeles. The city has largely been abandoned – except for the destitute and those who choose not to leave – thanks to the approach of an expanding desert, the Amargosa Dune Sea. Their inert existence gets shaken up when they steal neglected two-year-old from a group of druggies. Of course they have no idea what to do – Ig’s first diapers are a maxipad held on with a Hermes scarf – but decide they need to make a life change anyway. The three of them set out into the desert, hoping to get to the East Coast where life is supposed to be better.

Instead, they run out of gas somewhere out in the barren wasteland. Ray sets out, ostensibly to look for help, leaving Luz and Ig behind. They’re miraculously rescued by a group of nomads living on the Amargosa Dune Sea as it slowly rolls it way toward the California coast. But of course not is all it appears – the nomads have formed a sort of environmental cult leader who seduces Luz and wants to use Ig in service of a plan that clearly will not work. Chaos ensues.

EVEN MORE SPOILERS are coming!

Turns out, Ray is not dead. After spending some time in a prison/compound, he finds his way to the encampment and tries to get Luz and Ig back. The plan goes awry when it becomes even more clear that Ray and Luz are entirely unprepared to be caretakers for a baby. Members of the group – several who are clearly better people and better parents despite the cult behavior – take Ig and force Ray and Luz to leave the colony. There’s no redemption in this story… people are who they are and can’t be changed by even the most disruptive and extreme experiences.

I didn’t get to that conclusion about redemption when I first closed the pages. I had one of those “Huh?” moments… I think I liked this, but I don’t really get what happened? I turned, as I usually do, to Google, and came across this review from the New York Times by Emily St. John Mandel (such a good choice for a reviewer, given her stellar post-apocalyptic novel Station Eleven). She also articulated what I struggled with in the book, much better than I even can now:

The work suffers occasionally from a condition fairly common to apocalyptic novels, which might be described as the “now what?” problem. That is, it’s relatively easy to end the world in fiction, to shock and awe with the final disaster and establish the rules and parameters of the radically altered post-­apocalypse, but well, then what? The plot that Watkins comes up with — a love triangle, a seemingly idyllic community with a creepy secret — does not always match the originality of her prose.

But if this book is sometimes frustrating, it’s also fascinating. A great pleasure of the book is Watkins’s fearlessness, particularly in giving her characters free rein to be themselves. People who were shiftless and irresponsible before the disaster are shiftless and irresponsible afterward. This particular apocalypse is not an opportunity for redemption, and no one is ennobled by it.

Gah, that’s just so smart! Gold Fame Citrus isn’t a stellar book, but it is one of those books made more interesting when you have a chance to dig into it with other people.

One of the reasons I started blogging after college is I wanted to make sure I had an outlet to talk about books with other readers. But I’ve found that writing reviews of books isn’t necessarily the same as digging into them, as reading them closely to try and understand what a talented author is trying to do when they try something different or novel in a story. I miss those specific types of group conversation around books, and reading Gold Fame Citrus made me feel like those specific and analytical parts of my reading brain were starting to atrophy just a little bit.

But I can’t really think of a way to replicate classroom discussions online – reviews don’t really cut it, and a live chat or discussion group still misses that sense of people in a room. An in real life book club has potential, but it can be so, so hard to get the right group of personalities together for a good discussion (and to make sure everyone actually finished the reading – I’m as guilty of this as anyone!).

I’m not quite sure what the concluding thoughts on this post are, other than I liked Gold Fame Citrus – even if it wasn’t a totally successful novel – and I wish I had a way to parse through those strange moments so I understood it, and all the other lovely and complex literary novels I love, just a little bit better.

I’m curious what you think – what do you think are the pros and cons of online book discussions? Do you have an “in real life” friend or group where you discuss books regularly? What makes a successful book discussion in the digital age?

Some of the links in this post are affiliate links through Amazon. If you make a purchase through any of those links, I will receive a small commission.
{ 14 comments }